REF: PCP-00RESEARCH · THREAT INTELLIGENCE · COGNITIVE SECURITY

Personalized Cognitive Pressure CampaignsStarting from ₿ 0.10 BTC

When the target of a cyber operation is no longer the device — but the decision.

Artificial intelligence, behavioral analytics, synthetic media, automated agents and massive digital datasets are converging into a new information-security problem: the possibility of highly adaptive influence directed toward specific people, roles and decision environments.

REQUEST A CAMPAIGN →
REF: LAW-ETHPCP ARCHIVE

LEGAL & ETHICAL

Law, Ethics and AI Manipulation

A factual educational overview. This page does not constitute legal advice.

This page is educational and does not constitute legal advice.

EU AI Act

Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 prohibits certain AI practices involving subliminal or purposefully manipulative/deceptive techniques where specified conditions concerning impaired informed decision-making and significant harm are met. This is a factual description of the regulation, not an interpretation for any specific case.

Topics covered

EU AI ActAI manipulationDeceptive AISubliminal techniquesBehavioral manipulationPrivacy lawData-protection concernsPolitical microtargeting regulationDeepfake regulationImpersonationDefamationInformation-operation attributionResearch ethicsHuman-subject researchCorporate governanceMilitary ethics

Research and military ethics

Research involving human subjects requires informed consent and ethical review. Military and national-security applications of cognitive techniques raise distinct ethical questions about proportionality, attribution and the protection of non-combatants. This site addresses these questions descriptively and does not advocate for any specific capability.

● LAST REVIEWED: 2026-09-30 · REVIEW STATUS: EDITORIAL VERIFICATION · EVIDENCE-BASED

SOURCES & REFERENCES

  1. [1]
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) — EUR-Lex (2024) Source ↗
  2. [2]
    European Commission — AI Act — European Commission (2024) Source ↗