PRESS & MEDIA ROOM
Press Resources
Boilerplate, fact sheet, expert topics, and usage guidelines for journalists and media professionals covering AI-enabled cognitive threats and decision integrity.
BOILERPLATE
The Personalized Cognitive Pressure (PCP) Research Archive is a non-commercial defensive intelligence hub tracking AI-enabled cognitive threats, precision influence, and decision integrity. It publishes evidence-tagged research on personalized cognitive pressure — an emerging descriptor for the use of AI systems to shape the information environment surrounding a specific individual at the moment of a consequential decision. The archive covers threat architecture, AI-enabled attack vectors (AI persuasion, recommendation poisoning, synthetic media, cognitive twins), detection via Cognitive Security Operations Centers, and the Cognitive Decision Integrity (CDI) defensive framework. All claims are tagged as Documented, Emerging, or Hypothetical. The archive does not publish sensationalized content and distinguishes documented capabilities from hypothetical projections throughout.
FACT SHEET
EXPERT TOPICS FOR COMMENTARY
The archive is available for expert commentary on the following topics. Commentary is grounded in published research and the archive's evidence standards.
- 01Personalized cognitive pressure as an emerging cybersecurity descriptor
- 02AI-enabled persuasion: peer-reviewed evidence and limits
- 03AI recommendation poisoning: when the attack target is the AI assistant
- 04Synthetic media and the corroboration problem
- 05Cognitive twins: behavioral modeling for defensive purposes
- 06Cognitive Security Operations Centers (Cognitive SOC)
- 07Cognitive Decision Integrity (CDI) as a defensive framework
- 08Distinguishing documented operations from hypothetical scenarios
- 09Law, ethics, and the EU AI Act in the context of AI manipulation
USAGE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNALISTS
- ▸Cite the archive as "Personalized Cognitive Pressure Research Archive."
- ▸Respect evidence tags: do not present Hypothetical claims as Documented.
- ▸Avoid sensationalized terms — the archive uses "pressure" not "control," "cognitive" not "mind."
- ▸Hypothetical scenarios are analytical threat models, not confirmed operations.
- ▸The archive is defensive: techniques are described for detection and resilience, not implementation.
- ▸Content does not constitute legal advice.
PRESS CONTACT
For media inquiries, expert commentary requests, or press materials, contact the editorial team. Include your outlet, deadline, and the specific topic or question.
Press inquiries are reviewed within two business days. The archive does not provide off-the-record briefings on hypothetical operational scenarios.